Analysis of pair 4h2aA_3j9cA

4h2aA vs 3j9cA

Figure 1: Two structures (Fold1 & Fold2)

Figure 2: Two structures aligned

Missing: Fold1 vs best AF2
Missing: Fold2 vs best AF2
Missing: Fold1 vs best AF3
Missing: Fold2 vs best AF3
Missing: Fold1 vs best ESM2
Missing: Fold2 vs best ESM2
Missing: Fold1 vs best ESM3
Missing: Fold2 vs best ESM3
[missing] 4h2aA vs. 3j9cA (unaligned) — interactive
[missing] 4h2aA vs. 3j9cA (aligned) — interactive

Figure 3: Deep-MSA contact map panel

Figure 4: Best clusters contact map panel

Figure 5: All clusters contact-map mosaic (small multiples).

Per-cluster contact maps

Figure 6: Aligned per-residue ΔΔG (seq alignment overlay).

Figure 7: Phylogenetic tree with per-cluster heatmap.

Cluster metrics table

clusternneffAF2_TM1AF2_TM2AF3_TM1AF3_TM2RE-MSAT-COMRE-MSAT1RE-MSAT2ESM_SEQIDSESM_TM1_LISTESM_TM2_LIST
Deep--0.860.760.810.780.070.130.04---
000--0.850.760.920.850.090.110.07002; 002; 001; 001; 005; 005; 006; 003; 003; 0070.74; 0.74; 0.70; 0.69; 0.68; 0.68; 0.66; 0.64; 0.64; 0.610.71; 0.71; 0.68; 0.68; 0.64; 0.64; 0.70; 0.68; 0.68; 0.59
001--0.550.770.550.780.040.020.02008; 008; 002; 002; 004; 004; 005; 009; 009; 0050.69; 0.69; 0.69; 0.69; 0.65; 0.65; 0.63; 0.63; 0.63; 0.630.67; 0.67; 0.67; 0.67; 0.66; 0.66; 0.70; 0.67; 0.67; 0.70
002--0.730.730.730.750.070.140.05002; 002; 006; 006; 001; 001; 003; 003; 007; 0070.74; 0.74; 0.73; 0.73; 0.70; 0.70; 0.68; 0.68; 0.67; 0.670.72; 0.72; 0.72; 0.73; 0.68; 0.68; 0.67; 0.67; 0.63; 0.63