Analysis of pair 2qqjA_4qdsA
2qqjA vs 4qdsA
Missing: Fold1 vs best AF2
Missing: Fold2 vs best AF2
Missing: Fold1 vs best AF3
Missing: Fold2 vs best AF3
Missing: Fold1 vs best ESM2
Missing: Fold2 vs best ESM2
Missing: Fold1 vs best ESM3
Missing: Fold2 vs best ESM3
[missing] 2qqjA vs. 4qdsA (unaligned) — interactive
[missing] 2qqjA vs. 4qdsA (aligned) — interactive
Per-cluster contact maps
Cluster metrics table
| cluster | n | neff | AF2_TM1 | AF2_TM2 | AF3_TM1 | AF3_TM2 |
|---|
| Deep | - | - | 0.98 | 0.89 | 0.98 | 0.88 |
| 000 | - | - | 0.88 | 0.89 | 0.86 | 0.86 |
| 001 | - | - | 0.56 | 0.81 | 0.55 | 0.81 |
| 002 | - | - | 0.63 | 0.83 | 0.66 | 0.83 |
| 003 | - | - | 0.53 | 0.89 | 0.53 | 0.97 |
| 004 | - | - | 0.56 | 0.81 | 0.74 | 0.85 |
| 005 | - | - | 0.61 | 0.82 | 0.54 | 0.84 |
| 006 | - | - | 0.57 | 0.71 | 0.5 | 0.73 |
| 007 | - | - | 0.55 | 0.81 | 0.55 | 0.81 |
| 008 | - | - | 0.7 | 0.81 | 0.8 | 0.81 |
| 009 | - | - | 0.86 | 0.77 | 0.83 | 0.77 |
| 010 | - | - | 0.52 | 0.77 | 0.5 | 0.78 |
| 011 | - | - | 0.66 | 0.81 | 0.52 | 0.82 |
| 012 | - | - | 0.71 | 0.81 | 0.55 | 0.81 |
| 013 | - | - | 0.98 | 0.89 | 0.99 | 0.88 |
| 014 | - | - | 0.63 | 0.77 | 0.48 | 0.74 |
| 015 | - | - | 0.5 | 0.72 | 0.47 | 0.68 |
| 016 | - | - | 0.43 | 0.63 | 0.49 | 0.68 |
| 017 | - | - | 0.69 | 0.84 | 0.79 | 0.8 |