Analysis of pair 1jfkA_2nxqB
1jfkA vs 2nxqB
Missing: Fold1 vs best AF2
Missing: Fold2 vs best AF2
Missing: Fold1 vs best AF3
Missing: Fold2 vs best AF3
Missing: Fold1 vs best ESM2
Missing: Fold2 vs best ESM2
Missing: Fold1 vs best ESM3
Missing: Fold2 vs best ESM3
[missing] 1jfkA vs. 2nxqB (unaligned) — interactive
[missing] 1jfkA vs. 2nxqB (aligned) — interactive
Per-cluster contact maps
Cluster metrics table
| cluster | n | neff | AF2_TM1 | AF2_TM2 | AF3_TM1 | AF3_TM2 |
|---|
| Deep | - | - | 0.46 | 0.47 | 0.45 | 0.46 |
| 000 | - | - | 0.41 | 0.45 | 0.43 | 0.47 |
| 001 | - | - | 0.42 | 0.47 | 0.44 | 0.61 |
| 002 | - | - | 0.38 | 0.42 | 0.42 | 0.43 |
| 003 | - | - | 0.38 | 0.47 | 0.38 | 0.47 |
| 004 | - | - | 0.41 | 0.44 | 0.4 | 0.45 |
| 005 | - | - | 0.42 | 0.41 | 0.43 | 0.39 |
| 006 | - | - | 0.45 | 0.47 | 0.45 | 0.46 |
| 007 | - | - | 0.4 | 0.52 | 0.38 | 0.56 |
| 008 | - | - | 0.42 | 0.44 | 0.39 | 0.73 |
| 009 | - | - | 0.38 | 0.45 | 0.38 | 0.65 |
| 010 | - | - | 0.41 | 0.44 | 0.4 | 0.58 |
| 011 | - | - | 0.31 | 0.4 | 0.39 | 0.64 |
| 012 | - | - | 0.46 | 0.54 | 0.43 | 0.55 |
| 013 | - | - | 0.42 | 0.46 | 0.42 | 0.46 |
| 014 | - | - | 0.35 | 0.44 | 0.35 | 0.66 |
| 015 | - | - | 0.42 | 0.47 | 0.44 | 0.48 |
| 016 | - | - | 0.44 | 0.47 | 0.44 | 0.47 |
| 017 | - | - | 0.43 | 0.46 | 0.43 | 0.44 |
| 018 | - | - | 0.46 | 0.45 | 0.42 | 0.46 |
| 019 | - | - | 0.37 | 0.55 | 0.37 | 0.58 |
| 020 | - | - | 0.34 | 0.42 | 0.3 | 0.42 |